Publications

Five selected papers, each with a summary in plain language, followed by the full list for each research group.

Selected papers

Inflammation and Healing Lab

Early blood markers and complications after bowel surgery: a cohort study

Ashdown M, Vossberg C, Pemberley N, et al. Journal of Example Surgery, 2026. doi:10.5555/example.2026.001

In plain language: We measured inflammation in the blood of 400 people on the second day after bowel surgery. People with high levels were three times more likely to develop a complication, which suggests a simple test could help teams decide who needs closer monitoring.

Perioperative Outcomes Group

Home-based prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: a pilot randomised trial

Wrenfield T, Fenwright S, Aldous M, et al. Example Perioperative Medicine, 2025. doi:10.5555/example.2025.014

In plain language: Sixty people did a four-week home exercise programme before surgery, or usual care. Most people finished the programme, and those who did walked further after surgery. A larger trial is now recruiting.

Critical Care Recovery Group

One year after intensive care: recovery trajectories of patients and families

Brannagan I, Strand L, et al. Example Critical Care Journal, 2025. doi:10.5555/example.2025.022

In plain language: We followed 250 people for a year after intensive care. Half still had problems with fatigue at six months, and family members reported high levels of stress. Support needs to start before people leave hospital.

Digital Rehabilitation Lab

Agreement between smartphone step counts and the six-minute walk test

Ormsby F, Quill J, et al. Example Digital Health, 2026. doi:10.5555/example.2026.009

In plain language: Step counts from ordinary smartphones tracked closely with a standard clinic walking test. This means rehabilitation progress could be checked at home without extra equipment.

Community Trials Unit

Returning trial results to participants: a comparison of three approaches

Castellane P, Hartigan R, et al. Example Trials Methodology, 2025. doi:10.5555/example.2025.031

In plain language: We asked trial participants how they preferred to hear about results. Short videos and community meetings were both understood better than printed summaries, and people valued hearing from the research team directly.

Inflammation and Healing Lab

  • Inflammatory markers on the second post-operative day: a validation studyVossberg C, Pemberley N, Ashdown M. Example Surgical Science, 2026. doi:10.5555/example.2026.101
  • Wound healing trajectories in adults over 70Vossberg C, Ashdown M. Example Wound Research, 2025. doi:10.5555/example.2025.102

Perioperative Outcomes Group

  • Pre-operative walking tests and length of stayWrenfield T, Fenwright S. Example Anaesthesia Reports, 2026. doi:10.5555/example.2026.103
  • How patients talk about surgical risk: a qualitative studyAldous M, Wrenfield T. Example Health Communication, 2025. doi:10.5555/example.2025.104

Critical Care Recovery Group

Digital Rehabilitation Lab

  • A low-cost wrist sensor for home rehabilitation: design and bench testingOrmsby F, Quill J. Example Biomedical Engineering, 2025. doi:10.5555/example.2025.107

Community Trials Unit

  • Co-designing surgical trials with community health providersCastellane P. Example Trials Methodology, 2026. doi:10.5555/example.2026.108
  • How patients talk about surgical risk: a qualitative studyAldous M, Wrenfield T. Example Health Communication, 2025. doi:10.5555/example.2025.104